Comments on: Game Security – Part III: Militarism

By: Lewis Denby

Lewis Denby — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:57:52 +0000

Careful, folks. If you think something’s been written that’s unreasonable, the worst possible way of combating it is by making statements that are at least equally silly.

What qualifies someone as a “real gamer”?

What are “most games journalists” like?

Let’s keep this as a thoughtful discussion about the topic at hand. Disagreement is fine, but name-calling, stereotyping and baiting is not.

By: Fred

Fred — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:15:27 +0000

Wow-interesting analysis, but ‘warmonger’? C’mon. You are treating AA like it is something from Orwell’s 1984…relax. Or, go back to playing popcap and Runescape-let the real gamers handle the fun stuff.

^John, you hit the nail on the head.

By: john

john — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:40:08 +0000

Ah, the typical leftist response to things they don’t like; people aren’t intelligent enough to think for themselves so they need to be “protected from abuse” and “old ideas” (read; silence free speech and only fed them the “right kind” of propaganda).

Really, “warmongering”? Hyperbole doesn’t make cod intellectualism any less unimpressive

Don’t mean to stereotype but if you’re anything like most games journalists you probably couldn’t even lift a rifle let alone use it, so what you could possibly know about what war is I don’t know.

By: Game Security Part III Is Live « Wordcore

Game Security Part III Is Live « Wordcore — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:34:14 +0000

[...] concluding part of my three-part Game Security series went live on Resolution Magazine yesterday. In the final instalment I’ve taken a look [...]